Buy this book (please). No, really. I mean it.

I would prefer to give books away.

However, yesterday at the StAnza bookfair, I did my best to sell as many copies of How (Not) to Get Your Poetry Published as humanly possible. I told a number of poets they ‘ought’ to read it. What a presumption!

But it’s like this: poets ask things.Cover of How Not to, bright yellow, featuring anguished poet graphic and title in dark blue and red

They ask things like ‘what did you think of the recent publication by xxxx’? Or they ask, ‘I’m thinking of approaching xxxx. What do you think?’ Or, most worryingly of all, ‘I wonder if I might send you some of my poems?’

‘You need to read this book,’ I say. ‘It’s only taken eleven years to be able to write it, and it might save you a lot of time.’ It’s not the same as the pamphlet publication that preceded it, many copies of which I used to send (free) to poets who sent me their poems and didn’t know what they hadn’t done, but should have done, first.

I hate the way life is full of secret rules. You only find out later what you should have known to start with. To make it worse: some people seem to know these rules. Who told them?

I must get back to poetry, which is so very much more important, but I hope this book will do two things.

1. It will make some money to spend on publishing some poetry.

2.It will share the secret rules which you may, of course, learn eventually, but only after considerable pain. Save the pain.

It’s not just for new poets. Sometimes those who have one, or more than one, collection already in print have even more cause to read it. You don’t know what you don’t know.

The poetry publishing thing stirs up all sorts of emotions, and adjectives start flying in private conversations: unfair, unjust, unbalanced, nepotism, power, corruption, Private Eye. Please deliver us from temptation. Let us not mention funding. Let us not mention gate keepers. Read the book. It is funny in places, which is as it should be. Poetry is a serious matter, but poets should not take themselves too seriously.

I could say more, but today I’m going to StAnza to be on a panel discussing small magazines in the context of one of the best longstanding publications, Gerry Cambridge’s The Dark Horse, with Dana Gioa streamed in virtually from the States.

So no more from me today. Instead, here’s the link to what I wrote about StAnza in 2012. It still sums it up.

http://www.happenstancepress.org/index.php/blog/entry/instead-i-am-going-to-stanza

This is a poster/banner for The Dark Horse magazine, feating a giant horse looking round four covers of back issues, one on top of the next. You see the characteristic design of the magazine, and there's a big quote from the late Dennis O'Driscoll bottom left saying 'among the trully outstanding poetry mgazines of the English-speaking world'

THE FEROCITY OF FESTIVALS

When I was young poetry festivals didn’t exist.

After several days at StAnza last week, talking and listening, and reading and milling around, and the lovely subsequent ripples through blogs, FaceBook, Twitter, and so on, it’s hard to believe. The late twentieth and twenty-first century so far have seen horrendous wars, and they continue. But also there have been festivals. More and more of them.

When did arts festivals start? In 1969, there were distant reverberations about something called ‘Woodstock’. I was 16, and it had nothing to do with me. There was a record. There were hippies. It was music. There was flower power. All somewhere else. But the word ‘festival’ seeped through, and nothing to do with church and harvests.

Meanwhile, there was poetry in books. The books were dusty and lovely and usually second-hand. There were also the verses I was scribbling in secret and alone. The only person I talked to about poetry was my mother, when she was ironing. We did some poetry at school too. Poets were dead, male and we had to learn how to read them properly, like it or lump it.

The first festival experience for me was sitting at the back of poetry events in the Edinburgh Book Festival, which did not then have ‘International’ in its title. That was the late 1990s and the festival had already been going since 1983. But the tents in Charlotte Square were flimsy, buffeted by the wind. And it was weirdly intense and (for me) alienating. Nobody talked in the audience, unless they arrived with a friend. We waited in hushed silence for the poets to arrive and do their hallowed thing. If you asked a question after a reading, you had to muster every scrap of courage. I went away and wrote this (unsurprisingly unpublished):

Invitation to EBF:

join the ranks of the seriously in tents

depending on which session you select, you will
have a chance of being intellectual

please wear glasses, smoke intelligently,
make literary asides, listen intently

bring a small baby wearing a Next hat
and pretend not to notice when it starts
bawling save me save me mummy from these boring old farts!

The year of that poem (1997) was the first year of Ledbury, and around this time, Brian Johnstone and Anna Crowe in St Andrews were talking about starting something, the whisperings of early StAnza. The Aldeburgh Poetry Festival, Michael Laskey’s inspired idea, had already been going since 1988 – but I had never heard of it. And 1997 – that was the year Ledbury started. So something was in the air. It was still nothing to do with me.

Changed times. I go to poetry festivals now when I can. I go gladly, and particularly gladly and easily to my local fest, StAnza, which is only 20 miles away. There is a festival lecture each year – some aspect of poetry. Last week it was Glyn Maxwell on ‘the stanza’. His talk was funny, and delivered to a friendly, laughing audience who knew their onions (and their stanzas) and, usefully, the nursery rhyme ‘Who killed cock robin?’, around which the lecture was built. These days poetry matters don’t have to be intense, or obscurely intellectual, and the people in the audiences chat while they’re waiting, when they’re leaving, and hurl questions into the air with confidence. Some of them (thank you, Peter Jarvis, for one of the best moments) even sing.

Six years ago the StAnza guest lecturer was Jay Parini, once a student himself in St Andrews. He recalled 1968, when the English Professor was Alec Falconer. In the StAnza lecture 2009, he described how ‘contemporary poetry was not welcome in the house of Falconer’. In fact the good Professor told him ‘We do not need people writing more poetry. There is quite enough already.’

There are still those who agree with Professor Falconer. But happily not at StAnza, which manages, in its conversations, its asides, and its poets, to reach into the excitement of what is happening right now in whatever ‘poetry’ is or may be – such a range of styles, cultures, nations and continents! – while hanging onto its roots, its traditions, its firm footings and connections.

You don’t need me to tell you that poetry festivals are more than the programmed events. Aldeburgh, of course. StAnza. Ledbury. And newer ones: festivals or mini-fests at Newcastle, Reading, Wenlock, Bridlington, Derwent (at Matlock Bath), Cheltenham, Dundee, Arran, Stratford-upon-Avon, Wells-on-the-Sea, Trumpton (I made the last one up). And of course others, the ones I haven’t heard or remembered to mention.

A festival’s success can be measured by the buzz. It’s a buzz of voices in corridors, in cafes, on the streets, walking down the beach. It’s people mingling and talking and anybody can talk to anybody because it’s a shared and welcoming and equal experience. And so I heard Anne Stevenson (the American poet who has lived most of her life in the UK) telling someone about her long-standing friendship with Jay Parini; and someone else was chatting to my left with Carolyn Forché; and someone else was introducing Alice Notley; and Paul Durcan was at the coffee bar; and lots of faces, familiar and unfamiliar were laughing and joking or – in some of the events – concentrating in absolute silence. People of all ages. People you’ve heard of. People who could be anybody. People you think you might recognise but aren’t sure. Your cousin. Your next door neighbour. Directors of international festivals. Students. Poets. Un-poets. Readers. Groupies. Tourists. People buzzing. People scribbling. People doing that thing Anne Stevenson evoked in her reading of Making Poetry, (and that Fiona Moore later picked up in her blog): ‘inhabiting’ poetry.

It wasn’t always so. Here’s more of Jay Parini, remembering:

‘I joined the Poetry Society in my first term in St. Andrews, and – to my dismay – found it less than flourishing. We met once or twice a month that term, often in the bar of the Cross Keys, and would read poems to each other – our own poems. . . . Alastair Reid sometimes met with us, and encouraged us. There was another poet in the town, Evangeline Paterson, whose husband John Paterson was a lecturer in Geography. We often met at Evangeline’s purple-tinted house – everything was some shade of that royal color, even the toilet – and we drank cups of instant coffee or tea and ate biscuits and recited our poems to each other. These gatherings might last for three or four hours, and that, for me, was poetry in St. Andrews.’

Evangeline Paterson (I never met her though I feel as though I have) was mentioned by someone else this year in one of the StAnza events – I can’t remember who. And there is still a Cross Keys. The connections don’t vanish: it is a sort of relay race in which each of us, at some point, takes up the baton. 

Only yesterday it was 1973, when Jay Parini and some St Andrews university friends: ‘got some backing from local friends of poetry and from the university itself’ and held a little festival in Lower College Hall over two or three days. ‘The main readers were Seamus Heaney, who had just published Wintering Out and read widely from that collection, Alastair Reid (of course), George MacBeth, and Ian Crichton Smith, who was at the time a schoolmaster near Glasgow, and a poet of considerable fame in Scottish circles.’

And so Parini

‘began to write poems seriously, and to study poetry in a systematic way, often at length with Tony Ashe, Alastair, and Anne Stevenson. On a Sunday I would take a train to Glasgow to attend a seminar that Philip Hobsbaum would hold with Anne Stevenson in their spacious sitting room. These were vigorous evenings, and poets would read their work and be subjected to fierce scrutiny [. . . . ] The rigorous attention given to texts by the critics carried over nicely into a writing seminar. Everyone spoke bluntly about what they saw or heard in a poem. The focus on language was nothing short of ferocious.

And then suddenly there I was in 2015 chatting to poet Gerry Cambridge, who interviewed and worked with and knew Philip Hobsbaum in his later years, and whose journal, The Dark Horse celebrates its twentieth year this June. Twenty years! Where has the time gone? How can this be? We’re turning into history as we speak.

And as for the ferocity, it’s still with us. There is a kind of ferocity that’s friendly and fun. And anybody can join in. The Simon Armitage masterclass at this year’s StAnza bore witness to it.

A ‘masterclass’ sounds off-putting, I always think, like you have to be an expert to ‘get it’. Or at the very least a poet. But no. It isn’t so. It can simply be about reading and making connections, and our pleasure in that process. The good festival buzz invades everything, and the buzz makes you feel part of it, and unafraid. The buzz grows out of excitement about language and its possibilities. The buzz is about being human and having these amazing things – words – readily on hand and available to play with. And free. The buzz is the antithesis of war and hostility. It is friendship. It is welcoming. It is loud and quiet. It is inspiring and courageous and international. It explains why ordinary people come to poetry festivals in increasing numbers and why such astonishing, life-affirming events are, and should continue to be, funded.

 

[The photograph below is from June 6, 1983, the Pushkin Poetry Festival, drawn from the “RIAN archive 100588 All-Union Pushkin Poetry Festival” by RIA Novosti archive, image #100588 / Rudolf Kucherov / CC-BY-SA 3.0. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons]

b2ap3_thumbnail_800px-RIAN_archive_100588_All-Union_Pushkin_Poetry_Festival.jpg

 

SHUTTING UP

It was difficult getting the window to shut. Several envelopes were stuck in the hinges. But it has shut now.

Thank you! Thank-you to the writers who trusted me with their poems. It’s not an easy thing to expose your work to a critical reader, especially one who comments on verbs that are leaning, lines that are breaking and sonnets that are creaking. And towards the end that reader was very tired.

There are other thank-yous. If you spend a whole month reading like this, very little else can be done. So the ordinary functions of the press grind to a halt, which is risky. But many readers humbled me with their generosity before Christmas. They ordered publications, they sent donations, they sent stamps, they sent love. This secret fuel is amazing.

The window won’t open again in the same way. This was the apex, the peak, the nirvana of poetry reading. In May 2015 (still difficult not writing 2014) HappenStance will be ten years old. I will be nearly 62. And I plan to change things. How? Not quite sure yet.

But poets mainly create themselves. There will be, and always have be, people to whom making poems is important. Creating readers of poetry is harder. That’s what I’m working on.

Watching my fiendish work over the last weeks, more than one friend has said, ‘Why don’t you charge?’ Of course I have thought about this. The money, if some people paid for feedback, could be reinvested in the press. If payment were required, it would reduce the numbers dramatically. I haven’t ruled it out.

Still, I’ve a deep fear of poetry that’s by the privileged for the privileged. I am on the side of the garret and the baked potato. I am on the side of it is more blessed to give than receive. I believe, ridiculously, enough money will always arrive. So far, it has. Though only just.

***********************

Now here’s the ‘window’ analysis. I love figures.

162 poets sent in work. More than twice as many as the previous December. They sent between 1 and 29 poems, but it would average about 10 each. Most of them remembered the stamped addressed envelope. About 1600 poems, then.

Of these poets 107 were female and 55 were male.

I can’t comment on age range because I don’t ask people about that, though they sometimes tell me, but my unstatistical impression is that three-quarters were over 50 and only about 4 were under 25.

Nearly all the poets who sent poems were (hooray!) HappenStance subscribers. 17 were not. But they might yet be. I am an optimist.

About 30 took out a subscription just before sending poems in. (This is good if they also go on to buy publications, because it suggests they’re active readers. If they don’t buy anything subsequently, the postal subscription makes a loss).

Geography

  • 34 in Scotland
  • 3 in Wales
  • 2 in Ireland
  • 115.5 in England (of which 23.5 were in or near London)

as well as

  • 1 in Isle of Man
  • 1 in Sweden
  • 1 in Canada
  • 1 in Spain
  • 3.5 in France

I hope those numbers add up. This is me, not a spreadsheet talking.

I took 47 pages of (secret) notes. Most ever. These include notes on the bio, brief comments on the poems, and also comments on my comments and the experience of reading. Up to now I’ve done this by hand in large books, but this time I did it on the laptop because the books go back nine years and are hard to search. Many poets assume I’ll remember what they previously told me about themselves. I don’t. I get my Marys and Chris-es confused.

88 poets sent in poems for the first time, just over half. I rewrote the printed reply notes three times.

The level of guilt on my part was at 88% (I made that figure up. It means high). That’s because I made hardly any offers. I agreed to do two debut pamphlets in Spring 2016 (2015 was already ‘full’) but both authors already knew an offer was coming.

Normally I would have offered to do more in 2016. Two things stopped me.

First, it was the volume of poetry. It overwhelmed me. Second, I was astonished by how many possible debut poets, sending for the second, third or fourth time (so I was recognising poems I knew and loved), clearly merited publication in the next two years. I highlighted a group of 24 who fitted into this category. Twenty-four! If I did nothing else from now till 2017, I couldn’t manage that.

Fortunately, other things will happen for most of these poets. They’ll either win one of the competitions (as many who’ve send poems to me have done already) or find another publisher. I hope they’re all on the qui vive, spotting what’s going on in the sector, and which new imprints might be worth approaching. In the first three of four years of a new publishing business, a publisher is actively looking for new, good poets. After ten years, what she needs is not poets but readers. Or even better, poet-readers.

But also it’s important not to keep on doing the same thing in the same way, even if that thing has gone well up to now. Creativity thrives on change.

Also there’s Chapter Nine of the HappenStance Story to be written, three pamphlets urgently needing attention, StAnza tickets to buy, two new books nudging my collar, and the other 13 items on my list. And I had better get dressed.

Thank-you again. Huge thank-you. Thank you poets, blog readers and poetry buyers and supporters. You are not a vast community, in Harry Potter terms, but individually and en masse, you are . . . supercalifragelisticexpialidocious.

b2ap3_thumbnail_face-at-window-1.jpg

WHEN TIME STOPS

At StAnza this year, time stopped (for me) more than once in St John’s Undercroft, one of my most favourite venues in the world. Click on this sentence to see a picture.

The undercroft is an unexpected offshoot on South Street, not far from the fish shop. You just suddenly turn left into what seems like a doorway, shuffle down a few steps and find yourself in a medieval barrel vaulted cellar, which forms the cellar of a younger, but still ancient building. The stone ceiling arches over you, light streams in gently from windows on one side, and birds in the garden on the window side can be heard, as a backdrop, through every reading.

You can’t fit many people into the undercroft – perhaps 50? The small audiences intensify the listening experience, and it’s as though the words, released from the poets at one end, circle and embrace the listening human beings. A magical sort of space.

You would think the sound of the birds outside might distract. Somehow it does the opposite. I have never been more caught up in the sound of human voices than I have in the Undercroft.

You can be caught up there in meanings you like or dislike. You can be fascinated by verbal pictures that attract you or repel you. Whatever the experience, when you come out, blinking, into the shopping street outside, you are slightly changed. Occasionally, profoundly changed.

I sat in the Undercroft yesterday, listening to the remarkable Diana Hendry, one of our national treasures. She delivers her poems so beautifully that I found tears running down my cheeks not once, but twice. She read with SMSteele, whose poetry on the subject of soldiering, delivered with astonishing verve and charisma, filled me with unease in so many ways I was even more grateful for the birds. What was it Edward Thomas said somewhere – ‘Verse is the natural speech of men, as singing is of birds’?

War is a theme this year at StAnza, because it’s a hundred years since one started. And the first World War is the war for studying through literature at school. I have always been interested in (and slightly alarmed by) the relish young people have for the ghastly details in Wilfrid Owen. One of my former colleagues was a specialist on concentration camps. She went on holiday to visit them. Please don’t think I make light of this. I only remember it was so.

How to react to it all? How to process the meaning of wars that go on always somewhere? How to make sense of what we human beings are? Verse may be our natural speech. But we make weapons too. We maim and kill and hate. I once thought women might stop it all. Now I don’t think that.

In the Undercroft, both J.O. Morgan and Tomica Bajsić read about war too. Tomica is Croatian. He seemed incredibly young to me, but he is a war veteran. He spoke about the friends he lost in the war: his five dead friends. He read in English, his accent wrestling the English words slightly out of shape. Something in his process of mastering the language made it even more moving. I think it was his vulnerability, offered in language, as in content – his truth, his absolute honesty. If you are reading this now, at this minute, Sunday morning 9 March, 2014 ten past ten in the morning, you can hear him live streamed from a poetry breakfast. If time has elapsed, that chance will have been missed. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/stanza-2014

After Tomica, there was J O Morgan, about whom I have written before, delivered a long sequence from At Maldon. This time he had it by heart. I have never heard anything like it. I had heard him read before but I have never heard anything like this. For the first time in my life I grasped the living concept of the epic  — I inhabited it. J O Morgan took us inside that terrible, beautiful, ancient story of what men do, and held us there. Time stopped. If I had only heard him when I was reading Virgil at school, or later when I feebly attempted Homer, how different things might have been. But I’ve heard him now. I have heard him now.

 

THE SPACE BETWEEN THE STANZAS

This is cheating. I am really thinking about StAnza.

And this morning it’s snowing and around me all the trees are white and I’m not even there. I’m working. But this is a space between yesterday (when I was there) and today when I’m working.Snow in the garden

When I went to bed last night my head was full of the space between the stanzas, which for me was the space between the events at StAnza. The events are many, marvelous and magical, of course, and you can read about them elsewhere.

The spaces between the events are just as remarkable, and somewhat more mysterious because completely unpredictable, and not on the programme. When you run an arts festival, you create spaces for unexpected concatenations, correspondences and coalescences. I know that’s just alliteration, but how do you describe it?

On your way to hear a poet read, someone you may never have heard of, perhaps even in a language you don’t know, you stop for a coffee and fall into conversation with  Michel (?) from Belgium, there to present a film poem event, and whose job it is to co-ordinate and run literary events in  Antwerp – such a charming and interesting young (to me) man. And then we are joined by poet Paula Jennings and Jenny Elliott. Jenny is an old friend (we were once StAnza trustees together) and also a poet and originator of the Shed Press (in her garden shed). Together we sorted out European politics and then moved on to discuss our mothers, over soup and sandwiches (it’s not just poetry). As the table filled up with friends, I moved the flowers onto the floor. Out of the corner of my eye I could see people I knew and wanted to speak to, and others I dimly recognized from their dusty photos on book jackets.

Then an event and then the poetry book fair and then more chats with Tony Lawrence, who has redefined poetry according to laws of mathematics, and the man from Monifieth whose name I can’t remember but who has come to the festival every year for eleven years, and D A Prince, and Karin Koller, and Robyn Marsack and Sheila Wakefield and Stephanie Green and a long conversation – the longest we have ever had, (a GREAT conversation about the late David Tipton and his wife Ena Hollis, taking in John Lucas, Tony Ward and Alan Hill) – with Martin Bates; and another with the lady at the second hand book stall – shop in Newport – I forget her name but it will come back to me; and of course Gerry Cambridge and briefly Rob Mackenzie.

And Richie McCaffery and Stef, and Sally Evans and how lovely to see Ann Drysdale, who has written a whole book about Newport and thus a long conversation about W H Davies and other matters, and briefly (hug interval) Lyn Moir, and Lydia Harris (well met, for the first time) and Christine Webb, and Robert Minhinnick on Dylan Thomas, and Joy Howard and Alan Gay.

And many more. Many more, and some sought for but just missed. Deus ex machina (I’ve just realised that’s a double dactyl) Eleanor Livingstone slipping in and out carying strange objects and messages and inspirations. And others glimpsed in the distance or pausing to share treasure, or say ‘see you later’.

Extraordinary.

The sun has come out and lit up the snow.

And now back to work.